🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, nations are investing hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – creating national machine learning technologies. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are competing to create AI that understands native tongues and local customs.

The Global AI Arms Race

This movement is a component of a wider worldwide contest dominated by tech giants from the America and China. Whereas organizations like a leading AI firm and a social media giant invest enormous resources, middle powers are likewise making their own gambles in the AI field.

But amid such huge amounts in play, can smaller countries secure meaningful gains? As stated by a specialist from a prominent research institute, “Unless you’re a rich nation or a major corporation, it’s quite a hardship to create an LLM from the ground up.”

Defence Issues

A lot of countries are hesitant to rely on overseas AI technologies. Across India, as an example, US-built AI systems have occasionally been insufficient. A particular instance featured an AI tool used to teach learners in a isolated community – it communicated in the English language with a strong American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional students.

Then there’s the defence aspect. In India’s military authorities, using certain external systems is considered inadmissible. According to a founder noted, “It could have some unvetted data source that could claim that, such as, Ladakh is outside of India … Using that specific AI in a security environment is a big no-no.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to individuals who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, disregarding particular tools, they don’t even want to rely on US systems because details may be transferred overseas, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Efforts

Consequently, a number of countries are funding local initiatives. One such effort is being developed in India, wherein a company is working to build a domestic LLM with public support. This effort has committed approximately $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The founder foresees a AI that is significantly smaller than leading systems from Western and Eastern tech companies. He explains that India will have to compensate for the funding gap with skill. Based in India, we lack the option of allocating massive funds into it,” he says. “How do we compete with for example the enormous investments that the United States is investing? I think that is the point at which the key skills and the strategic thinking comes in.”

Native Emphasis

Throughout the city-state, a government initiative is supporting language models developed in the region's regional languages. These particular languages – such as the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and others – are often inadequately covered in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are building these national AI systems were informed of the extent to which and the speed at which the frontier is progressing.

A leader engaged in the initiative says that these systems are designed to supplement bigger models, instead of replacing them. Systems such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he says, frequently have difficulty with local dialects and culture – communicating in unnatural the Khmer language, for instance, or suggesting meat-containing dishes to Malaysian users.

Building regional-language LLMs enables state agencies to include local context – and at least be “informed users” of a sophisticated tool built elsewhere.

He further explains, I am cautious with the concept national. I think what we’re trying to say is we want to be better represented and we wish to grasp the abilities” of AI platforms.

Multinational Collaboration

Regarding states attempting to carve out a role in an intensifying international arena, there’s an alternative: join forces. Analysts connected to a well-known institution recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative shared among a consortium of emerging countries.

They call the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, in reference to the European successful strategy to build a alternative to Boeing in the 1960s. Their proposal would see the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would merge the capabilities of different nations’ AI programs – including the United Kingdom, Spain, the Canadian government, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the Western and Eastern major players.

The main proponent of a report outlining the concept notes that the idea has gained the interest of AI officials of at least a few countries so far, along with multiple state AI firms. Although it is currently centered on “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have additionally indicated willingness.

He explains, In today’s climate, I think it’s just a fact there’s reduced confidence in the assurances of the present White House. People are asking such as, can I still depend on these technologies? Suppose they decide to